Category: Research

  • Framework For Non-Traditional Postgraduate Success

    Framework For Non-Traditional Postgraduate Success

    The DaVinci Institute’s alumna, Dr Carin Stoltz-Urban’s study explored why non-traditional postgraduate students, typically older, working adults with family and community responsibilities, struggle to complete their studies. It also develops an institutional framework aimed at enhancing their success and retention in African higher education contexts. Using a grounded theory approach, the research draws on literature, interviews, and focus groups conducted across South Africa, Kenya, and Zimbabwe.

    Key Challenges Facing Non-Traditional Students:

    Balancing Work, Study, and Family

    Many non-traditional students juggle demanding careers and family obligations. While workplace support can positively influence success, inflexible schedules and a lack of employer understanding often hinder progress.

    Emotional and Psychological Strain

    Students reported high levels of stress, anxiety, and discouragement. Feelings of uncertainty about academic ability were common, often tied to low academic self-efficacy and inadequate preparation for postgraduate demands.

    Academic Literacy and Integration

    Lack of academic writing and research skills was identified as a major barrier. Students struggled with understanding academic expectations at the postgraduate level, highlighting the need for stronger academic induction and literacy support.

    Institutional Factors Influencing Success

    Service Orientation and Flexibility

    Institutions’ attitudes and responsiveness to student needs play a critical role. A student-centred culture, flexibility in access to resources, after-hours support, adaptable payment structures, and consistent communication are key enablers of success.

    Management and Administration

    Strong institutional management, including staff accountability, effective communication, and monitoring of student progress, supports retention. Administrative inefficiencies, in contrast, contribute to frustration and attrition.

    Social and Academic Integration

    While traditional models of social integration may not fully apply to non-traditional students, fostering a sense of belonging through peer support and friendly, accessible staff enhances motivation and persistence. Academic integration through clear induction and mentoring remains essential.

    The Role of the Academic Supervisor

    Supervisors emerged as pivotal to postgraduate success. Effective supervisors balance expertise with mentorship, provide timely feedback, maintain open communication, and offer emotional encouragement. Their accessibility and administrative efficiency significantly affect student progress.

    The Proposed Institutional Framework

    The framework positions the student as the centre of a multi-layered ecosystem:

    • Microsystem: The student’s personal skills, motivation, and resilience.
    • Mesosystem: Personal and family contexts influence emotional and logistical support.
    • Exosystem: Institutional environment, including supervisor relationships and service quality.
    • Macrosystem: Broader socio-economic and national education context.

    Institutions should adopt a holistic, student-centred approach focusing on:

    • Enhancing academic self-efficacy, resilience, and self-regulated learning;
    • Providing flexible, responsive services and clear communication;
    • Strengthening management accountability and progress monitoring;
    • Building supportive academic and social networks;
    • Ensuring qualified, engaged supervisors.

    Limitations and Recommendations

    The study’s findings are grounded in three African countries and may need broader validation. Future research should explore non-traditional student experiences at the undergraduate level and develop a dedicated framework for academic supervision.

    Conclusion: Non-Traditional Postgraduate

    Dr Stoltz-Urban concluded that while student attributes, motivation, resilience, and self-efficacy are vital, the primary responsibility for enabling success rests with institutions. Universities must consciously design systems that accommodate the complex realities of non-traditional postgraduate students. A culture of flexibility, accountability, and empathy can transform retention outcomes and strengthen Africa’s postgraduate education landscape.

  • Public Sector Leadership’s Enhancement Within SETAs In The Era of 4IR – Dr Felleng Anacleta Yende

    Public Sector Leadership’s Enhancement Within SETAs In The Era of 4IR – Dr Felleng Anacleta Yende

    Dr Felleng Anacleta Yende‘s doctoral study explored how Public Sector Leadership (PSL) can be enhanced within the South African Sector Education and Training Authorities (SETAs) in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). The study acknowledged that while 4IR technologies present significant opportunities for public sector efficiency and innovation, the leadership in South Africa’s SETAs has not fully adapted to or harnessed these advancements.

    The Role of SETAs

    SETAs, established under the Skills Development Act (No. 97 of 1998), were mandated to identify skill demands, implement training initiatives, and promote employment across sectors. According to Dr Yende, despite these noble intentions, their performance has been widely criticised due to governance challenges, mismanagement, inefficiency, and weak accountability. 

    Public Records

    She referenced that Auditor-General reports and empirical studies indicate less than 40% of SETAs operate efficiently. This research investigated how PSL, when combined with 4IR technologies, can address these chronic issues.

    Research Methodology

    The study used a qualitative exploratory case study design, and the researcher engaged 11 key stakeholders from the Post School Education and Training (PSET) ecosystem. The study applied an eclectic theoretical framework incorporating systems theory, socio-evolutionary theory, and responsibility attribution theory to explore the interplay between leadership, organisational adaptability, and technological innovation.

    Key Study Findings – Dr Felleng Anacleta Yende

    Key findings suggest a strong awareness among stakeholders of the importance of digital transformation in improving SETA performance. Stakeholders recognised that technology could streamline workflows, improve accountability, and reduce material mismanagement. 

    However, current leadership lacks the digital readiness and transformational competencies required for the 4IR era. The leadership models in place are largely outdated, hierarchical, and transactional, thus misaligned with the collaborative and agile leadership required in the 4IR context.

    The study proposes a conceptual framework comprising seven pillars to enhance PSL in SETAs:

    • Managing Organisational Complexity – Leaders must understand and manage systemic interdependencies.
    • Responsiveness to Change – Adaptability is critical in navigating fast-paced technological and socio-economic shifts.
    • Leadership Development – Investment in developing digital leadership competencies is essential.
    • Transformational Leadership – Emphasising vision, innovation, and change agency over bureaucratic control.
    • Ethics, Accountability, and Service Orientation – Rebuilding public trust through ethical, transparent leadership.
    • Digital Transformation – Leveraging AI, data analytics, and ICT to enable performance and decision-making.
    • Collaboration and Partnerships – Engaging stakeholders across public, private, and educational sectors to drive integrated development.

    Key Findings

    The study of Dr Felleng Anacleta Yende concluded that Leadership 4.0, an approach integrating digital transformation with leadership strategy, is essential for SETAs to fulfil their mandate effectively in the 4IR context. This leadership style supports innovation, participatory decision-making, and continuous learning.

    Further, the study identifies several gaps in current practices, including poor monitoring and evaluation systems, lack of performance tracking, and insufficient collaboration between SETAs and industries. It emphasised the role of adaptive leadership and systems thinking as critical enablers of a functional skills development ecosystem.

    In terms of methodology, the study used desktop content analysis, document reviews, and semi-structured interviews. It acknowledged the limitations brought by COVID-19 lockdown restrictions and the partial participation of key decision-makers like SETA CEOs.

    In conclusion, this research contributed to academic and practical discourses on public sector innovation. It recommended that future research on implementing the proposed framework, particularly within specific SETAs or broader PSET environments, to assess its applicability and impact. Want to enquire about one of our of our programmes? Fill out this form and one of our DaVincians will reach out to you.